Jump to content

Talk:Yona Metzger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I'm not yet so familiar with the way these discussions on Wikipedia, my excuses in the case this is not the right place to raise my question. Here it comes: Is it right to call a convicted fraud with the title 'rabbi'?? Shouldn't this man be called 'former rabbi'?? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borger Brother (talkcontribs) 15:22, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's rather bizarre that pages on rabbis should comprise >50% "controversy". This is really not the way we should be presenting these people. A lot of this stuff can be condensed down or merged with other relevant pages. Alternatively, the "positive" section of the article should be expanded to provide balance.

I asked ShalomShlomo (talk · contribs) to list Metzger's works. Just saying that he wrote "several books" is not in proportion to the long paragraphs on the controversy surrounding his election and "criminal allegations". JFW | T@lk 12:02, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • JFW- Not having read the books, I really don't consider myself in a position to say much about them. (Would YOU care to add anything?) If the page is mostly about negative controversy surrounding Metzger, it's more a result by default than intent. There simply isn't that much information available about Metzger, both in terms of background and present activities. He was relatively unknown (or rather, undistinguished, in comparrison to some of his peers in the Chief Rabbinate) before his election. Furthermore, he doesn't seem to have done that much news-worthy stuff in the past two years. I'd be happy to include more stuff if I could find it. Feel free to point me to places and I'll add it. Google Yona Metzger and see what comes up- it's scandal, scandal, Armenians. To Metzger's (and my) credit, I did try to add quite a bit of stuff regarding his ongoing involvement with the Armenian communities. I will continue to look for more stuff in the next few days, but would prefer not to be chastized if nothing comes up.
If other people have more information they'd like to contribute, I'm all in favor of it. However, :it's a bit unfair to criticize people for not having enough positive material on rabbis when most of :the "common knowledge" about them tends towards negative press. I can't do anything about that, and :if the choice is between having two sentences saying, "Metzger served in the army and was born in :Haifa" and having a detailed page that is mainly about news-worthy, if critical, incidents about :him, I'm going to tend towards the latter. Better that people be irritated at a perceived "slant" :and work to change it than that there be nothing there (to say nothing of the potential-censorship :issue).
The only alternative to the present situation is to either get more people with knowledge about :Metzger to contribute (hint), or to delete the controversial components in order to have the article :be as bare-bones as possible. Obviously, I'm not really in favor of the latter, but until the former :happens, I don't see any way around the current state of the page.
Interested in your thoughts. ShalomShlomo 12:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
ShalomShlomo, my criticism was not specifically aimed at you but I'm glad you've expanded the positive side. I'm not a specific supporter of Metzger and know little about him, but it is not "censorship" to tone down all the criticism a bit to let a fuller non-critical picture of the man emerge. Negativity is easy to find, and apparently Metzger has a bit of an image problem in the press. Wikipedia should work towards balance and WP:NPOV - in my view providing the positive aspects is part of adhering to NPOV. JFW | T@lk 15:48, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
JFW- Thanks for the clarification. I agree that NPOV should be the goal but it can be difficult when the majority of the information easily available is slanted towards the negative. But hey, it's a work in progress; I'll keep looking for more info and in the meantime, if there's anything you (or someone else you feel might have something valuable to contribute,) want to add anything, feel free. I'll also take a look at the controversial bits (specifically the election part) and see if I can't whittle that down a bit. The goal with that was mainly to give enough background to the lay reader for them to understand why Metzger's election, whether you agreed with it or not, was a big deal. Perhaps I'll use part of this to create a general information page on Orthodox politics in Israel. ShalomShlomo 23:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fact or analysis

[edit]

I removed this from the page for discussion here:

However, others have suggested that the perception of Metzger not having a "real base" has in fact hurt his credibility. Many Religious Zionists consider Metzger to have "sold out" to the haredim, and the haredim by and large do not consider Metzger to be a legitimate member of their community. The fact that he was not of high standing among either group prior to the election has not helped his prestige.

Without a solid source it is very hard to sustain a paragraph like this. I have no doubts that a source can be found, but in the meantime it is original research. JFW | T@lk 21:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

JFW- So, are you saying we sould find a source for it and put it back in, or just leave it out? ShalomShlomo 07:07, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
That is not my point. My point is that it is presently lacking a source. If a solid source is presented I don't see why this cannot be included. JFW | T@lk 22:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


How in the world can this page begin with the phrase "Rabbi Metzger is not Jewish..."?

LGBTG Criticism

[edit]

Realizing the delicacy of discussions of this nature, I'm not sure that it makes sense to sandwhich this criticism essentially accusing him of possessing the standard institutional political views of his institution inside paragraphs accusing him of things like personal incompetence, personal bad character, or personal misconduct. If one includes routine institutional political differences of this type, why limit it to this one topic? Why not include criticism from, say, fundamentalist Christians for his failure to accept Jesus as his Messiah, from Hezbollah for his collaborations with the Zionist entity, from Richard Dawkins for his failure to promote atheism, or from any number of other opponents of or dissenters from the historical institutional positions of the institution he was appointed to head for his failure to take their side rather than his institution's? --69.115.221.42 (talk) 02:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Yona Metzger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Yona Metzger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Yona Metzger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yona Metzger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]